• Announcements

    • Terry (WGS)

      WGS Forums Will Close on January 31st 2017   01/18/17

      Hi everyone, We're coming up to We Got Served's ten year anniversary and I've been taking a good look at the site to work through some plans for the future. I wanted to give you all a couple of weeks notice that I'll be closing WGS Forums at the end of this month.  As you'll be aware, the forums were opened to support Windows Home Server users and have done so brilliantly, thanks to everyone's participation. However, with each day that passes, there are fewer and fewer WHS deployments out there, meaning that forum registrations and traffic has now dwindled. I've tried a few times over the years to test some forums on related or adjacent topics, however, they simply haven't caught on. It's clear that these were always going to be predominately Windows Home Server forums and, with the passing of that platform, they've served their purpose well. So, please take some time to archive anything you need over the next two weeks. Access to the forums will end on Jan 31st 2017. Many, many thanks once again for your participation and support here. It's been a great community! Very best wishes Terry
WHSwede

Slow Download (And Upload) After Whs Sp2

11 posts in this topic

A month or so back I finally installed SP2 on my WHS-setup. Don't really know why because everything was running just fine. After that upgrade I have now discovered that downloading torrents maxes out on 50kb/s (more often max 10) and before SP2 I had around 800kb/s. (DSL-connection)

I'm am not sure that the service pack has something to do with this issue but other than that I have changed nothing. Nor has my ISP changed anything that I know of. I get good download speed if I use for example Bitcomet for downloading of torrents to my regular Windows 7 computer. Only in uTorrent on the WHS it is slow. I have never more than 5 downloads in progress. (set maximum to 5). Global max is at 200 and max connected peers per torrent is set to 100. Any ideas as what to try? (before trying to restore my WHS to before SP2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.

 Are you using the same version of utorrent before the update as you are after the update?

Also, do you mean Power Pack 2?  Service Pack 2 is actually an erroneous indicator of patch level.  See the link for explanation.

http://social.micros...72-6f9050f530e2

You actually cannot upgrade to or download from SP2 as it is the code base on which WHS is built. "Windows Home Server is built on the same codebase as Windows Server 2003 SP2.  It includes almost all technologies found in Windows Server 2003 SP2 but has been modified in some areas to remove or limit features.  It also includes some new capabilities not found in Windows Server 2003 SP2."

Which Power Pack are you using?  Your console will tell you that, as per the link above.  Also, not sure if you can remove Power Pack 2.  On my system it says it cannot be removed, but that might just be because Power Pack 3 is installed, and maybe you have to uninstall in reverse order as installed.  However, I really do not think this is necessary, as I am fully patched (PP3) and utorrent will max my available bandwidth on my WHS.  I think it may be something other than WHS itself.  If you have recently updated utorrent, I'd try an older version of utorrent possibly.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More likely you need to get the latest network drivers / configure your offloading or flow control settings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm on Powerpack 3, but it says Service Pack 2.

As for uTorrent I don't know if I have a new version since installaing power pack 3... will look in to that. As for new network card drivers I guess I could try to revert to older drivers there to but I have good download speeds through Internet Explorer and when copying files on my local network it performs nicely on my gigabit LAN.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm on Powerpack 3, but it says Service Pack 2.

As for uTorrent I don't know if I have a new version since installaing power pack 3... will look in to that. As for new network card drivers I guess I could try to revert to older drivers there to but I have good download speeds through Internet Explorer and when copying files on my local network it performs nicely on my gigabit LAN.

I doubt it was the upgrade process. I would echo the NIC drivers issue; it makes all the difference with bit torrent. Find your vendor's site and upgrade to their latest for Windows Server 2003. The Windows Update rarely gets you the driver you really want to use. Also, if that doesn't help, try blasting away your uTorrent settings and re-instantiate them. I can remember a time or two I started getting horrible speeds and forgot I modified some advanced setting.

Good Luck

-JesterEE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it was the upgrade process. I would echo the NIC drivers issue; it makes all the difference with bit torrent. Find your vendor's site and upgrade to their latest for Windows Server 2003. The Windows Update rarely gets you the driver you really want to use. Also, if that doesn't help, try blasting away your uTorrent settings and re-instantiate them. I can remember a time or two I started getting horrible speeds and forgot I modified some advanced setting.

Good Luck

-JesterEE

Looked into the driver matter. I have been using the same driver for my NIC since day one with my WHS. My NIC is an integrated one, Intel PRO/1000 GT and the driver suggested both by Windows and Intels online detector is 8.10.3 from august 2008.

I haven't been fiddling around with any settings in uTorrent. The only thing I have done the last few months is PP3. Before that it ran for 1.5 years without me changing a thing. Perhaps some uTorrent updates and of course all Windows update suggested.

Guess I will end up reinstalling WHS completely or change for another torrent software... although I have grown to really like uTorrent.

Last night I spent 4 hours straight trying a zillion settings in uTorrent as instructed on varies guides and how-to's around the net.... no good

I did think I cracked it a few times but it lasted for maximum 1 minute . During that minute I could get speeds at least above 200kb/s from various torrents. I'm out of ideas...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm at a loss too other than suggesting trying a different (pre 2.0) version of utorrent.  As I mentioned previously, I have a fully updated and patched WHS (Acer H340), am using original network drivers, and I can max my 6/1 pipe.  However, I am using utorrent 1.8.5 on WHS.  I'd try "downgrading" utorrent first to rule out changes in the 2+ version as the cause.  Of course that is assuming that you weren't using that prior to updating WHS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: The underlying OS is indeed Server 2003 Service Pack 2. Only the WHS Console will show the details as Powerpack 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm at a loss too other than suggesting trying a different (pre 2.0) version of utorrent.  As I mentioned previously, I have a fully updated and patched WHS (Acer H340), am using original network drivers, and I can max my 6/1 pipe.  However, I am using utorrent 1.8.5 on WHS.  I'd try "downgrading" utorrent first to rule out changes in the 2+ version as the cause.  Of course that is assuming that you weren't using that prior to updating WHS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Looked quickly for an older version of uTorrenet but couldn't find it. (not at official site anyway). Will look further tonight and try that first... before reinstalling WHS.

/J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look on the right had column there are all builds, beta and stable.  You might need to click "view more" at the bottom of the list get some of the older builds, as with all the betas of 2.x it mostly predominates that list.

http://www.filehippo.com/download_utorrent/

Downgraded to 1.8.1 and initially it seems downloads has taken a turn... to the faster. Not very fast but that might be due to the torrents in them selves right now. Will evaluate this for a couple of days. Thanks for the link!

One downside thought seems to be that the Webui isn't really up to date as it isn't showing what is actually going on. Downgraded webui as well but it is very buggy. Will look further into that when speeds are at a satisfying level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Posts

    • I am running WSE2012 R2 and I only ever see red, yellow or green. I have never seen blue even when backing up. I can't explain what could be happening here, but maybe some feedback from other users may help us pin it down. What OS are your client PC's? Mine are all Win 10. Not sure if that may have a bearing.   
    • I made the leap from WHSv1 to WSE2012R2.  I like the new system but one thing seems to be missing.  In WHS v1, the tray icon would change colors to indicate various things blue - backing up now green - everything is healthy yellow - warnings detected (e.g. haven't backed up in a while) red - critical issues (e.g. recent backup failed) In WSE 2012 R2, however, I only get the blue and green indicators, even when there are critical errors on my home network.  For example, a server hard drive had failed for several weeks, but the connector icon in my system tray remained green.  I only discovered the issue when I happened to login to the dashboard for something else. Does anyone know if this feature has been removed in the latest WSE versions?  Or have I just mis-configured something?
    • I am building a new home server: I really want to use StableBit DrivePool and Scanner - am used to them and like the relative ease of use. Hardware = PC running Windows 7 Pro has SSD for OS and 5 additional 2TB HDDs + SansDigital Towerraid (model TR5M6G) connected by eSATA controller (pCie) with 5 2TB HDDs of varying age (2 brand new WD Red and the remaining 3 a combo of Hiatachi and Seagate of varying age - all test out fine for now). Towerraid is currently configured as JBOD, so I can't really see individual drives, and neither does StableBit drive pool - so I get a pool consisting 5 1.82 TB drives (the ones on the PC) and 1 giant 9.1TB drive. I have about 10 TB of data ready to go into this new build.  Will be adding more over time.  Not sure when but certain I'll have HDDs go bad on me, of course. My question(s): 1)  Is there a RAID configuration that will let StableBit do its thing watching individual drives and letting me identify sick drives that need to be removed/replaced?                           2)  If I decide to give up the RAID and just let DrivePool handle duplication, how do I configure the SansDig?                           3)  Am I just getting it all wrong from the get-go? Would appreciate any advice - thanks   
    • I have almost 10 TB in the storage pool so I was not surprised when my first server backup took a very long time (22 hrs.).  Lately the incremental server backups have been fast (15 - 18 min.)  Two days ago the server apparently initiated a full backup that failed twice but completed successfully this morning after about 23 hours.  An hour later the regular daily backup is back to a normal incremental backup times (18 min.) So why did the previous backup take so long, as long as a full backup would take? Does the server occasionally make a fresh start with a full backup to reduce the time a full incremental recovery takes?  (fewer increments, less processing time) I don't see a setting in the server backup options for specifying a number of increments between full backups, for example.    
    • I just posted a similar question elsewhere.  By Shadow Copies are you referring to the Windows 10 File History backups that periodically use shadow copy to backup open files? I too discovered that a huge amount of backup space was consumed by File History backups, no doubt because I was moving some large Blu-Ray files around.  That I fixed by moving the temporary and final file folders to the server, where they are backed up as part of the daily server backup.  That too, of course, uses Shadow Copies but that is another story. Has anyone done the math?  What is the equivalence .. or lack thereof ... between the traditional WS2012r2 (WHS v1 et al.) daily incremental backup :: and a Win7 System Image backup + File History backups? Restore time comparison? Which do you feel is best?
  • Popular Contributors