Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
raff98

How To Restore A 64 Bit Pc Backup

8 posts in this topic

I have an Asus UL30A windows 7 64 bit. Due to certain issues, I need to restore to a good backup (complete restore) I get to the restore point - it does not find my network. I call HP, they say I need a 32 bit driver, 64 not supported. HP told me to pull the hard drive, and restore in another machine running 32 bit. That would invalidate my UL30a warranty. This is nuts, I can back up 64bit, but need 32 bit driver to restore? Anyone have any ideas, or a 32 bit Asus driver? This is my second machine, 470 failed, upgraded to 495, hard drive in it failed, then replaced that - month later whole system crashed and lost all my data. Now I have a seperate hard drive to back up the server! (sorry, my HP luck is not good)

Anyone know where I can get a correct 32 bit lan driver for the UL30A?

Thanks for help!

(anyone recommend a better backup system? 2 servers for sale)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.

I have an Asus UL30A windows 7 64 bit. Due to certain issues, I need to restore to a good backup (complete restore) I get to the restore point - it does not find my network. I call HP, they say I need a 32 bit driver, 64 not supported. HP told me to pull the hard drive, and restore in another machine running 32 bit. That would invalidate my UL30a warranty. This is nuts, I can back up 64bit, but need 32 bit driver to restore? Anyone have any ideas, or a 32 bit Asus driver? This is my second machine, 470 failed, upgraded to 495, hard drive in it failed, then replaced that - month later whole system crashed and lost all my data. Now I have a seperate hard drive to back up the server! (sorry, my HP luck is not good)

Anyone know where I can get a correct 32 bit lan driver for the UL30A?

Thanks for help!

(anyone recommend a better backup system? 2 servers for sale)

*****************************

Head over to the Asus web site for your 32bit drivers.

WHS 2011 is 64bit and will offer you better driver support on restores.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Garry is correct, all you need is a NIC driver so that restore process can make use of the NIC to access your server. The restore process has nothing to do with the system being restored being 32-bit or 64-bit, it simply needs a driver to make use of the NIC in your computer.

First, do you have or did you create a set of restore discs with your computer? If so, pull the NIC drivers off the drivers disc and put them on a USB drive. If not, go to the ASUS website as Garry indicated and pull the drivers (32-bit) off their website; put those drivers on a USB drive.

Start the restore process again. When the "load the drivers" screen comes up again, point the process to the folder on that USB drive. The restore process will use this driver to access your WHS, restore your machine, and life goes on.

I had to go through this exact same process a few weeks ago when my youngest caught a nasty virus on his brand new laptop. It was easier to restore then to clean the machine.

I agree with Garry in that WHS 2011 will be better then WHS v1 regarding drivers, however, it to will become a problem as new NICs are shipped with drivers that WHS 2011 does not recognize.

--- This is an inherent probrom with any MS OS, in regards to drivers. As a BMR device, MS simply needs to do a better job of extracting the NIC drivers from a machine to be able to allow the user to connect to a computer if it fails.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did try the files I downloaded off the Asus web site, added to USB, however, did not work It showed an Atheos driver on the restore screen but could not find the server. I will dig for restore discs, but if not, can someone help me to ensure I got the right drivers (link if possible) (i disabled wirless so it would only use NIC)

Also, I downloaded the "windows home server files" from the server. (not folder, just files per HP tech). However, each of these is another folder, there are about 6 of them (all under root of "WHS Recovery" do I need to take these driver files out of their folder to, of, according to HP, just copy whatever is under the folder for WHS recovery"

Again, any link would help, not sure if driver I downloaded. is correct (went through Assus, selected windows 7 (not 64 bit, extracted these to USB.

If it helps ASUS UL30A-X5

Thanks everyonr!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I managed to find the driver install package. When I get the the connections box of restore, it shows the NIC card, but till cannot find the server. I must be missing something big.

Thank You again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I managed to find the driver install package. When I get the the connections box of restore, it shows the NIC card, but till cannot find the server. I must be missing something big.

Thank You again

Just so we understand correctly, the restore procedure did find and *install* the drivers? Quite often driver packages are universal, but what you are looking for are Windows 2003 or Windows XP drivers, *not* Windows 7 drivers. These drivers are required for the restore program.

Windows 7 does enter into the process at all until the restore process is done and you reboot the restored machine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could do a lot worse than pop over to Breaking Home Server and downloading the Client Restore Disc from there... I had similar problems trying to restore a 64-bit system and getting into a tizzy trying to get the right drivers, etc.. The Client Restore Disc from BHS had almost every driver pack under the sun slipstreamed in - and worked for me first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hexland, I realize this topic is a year old, but would you happen to still have that Client Restore Disc ISO?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Posts

    • I wouldn't go for Storage Spaces - there have been reports of issues when a disk goes bad (and I too have had that sort of problem). You can go down the RAID route if you have the hardware controller to support it - don't go for software RAID. Alternatively, have a look at Stablebit Drivepool which give you the flexibility of duplication at the folder level or across all storage. If you have data that doesn't need to be protected, you don't have to sacrifice the space for duplication of that folder. 
    • Like I said, you won't get the combined (aggregate) bandwidth to a single destination.   Torrenting makes multiple outgoing and can receive multiple incoming connections to and from multiple seeders and leechers (behaving more like the load-balanced scenario) in the best-case scenario, so it's one of the few applications that scale fairly well with WAN load-balancing, and if you're just downloading data, the torrent application can reassemble the whole torrent from the randomly received chunks from each seeder.  Torrent was almost designed to benefit from WAN load-balancing because of the way the P2P network was conceived. ...but that wouldn't work for streaming media or online gaming or VoIP where there's no mechanism to deal with out-of-order packets being sent and received, or the fact that it's still asymmetrically routed -- in that instance, you're still limited to the bandwidth of a single connection, you can just make more of them at a time on different paths.   802.3ad or LACP (Dynamic Link Aggregation) requires switching and routing hardware that's also LACP-compliant in order for it to work, but in that case, would be more like the aforementioned ISP IMUX connection than WAN load-balancing.   Your SpeedTest results are probably from burstable traffic over one connection, because a single SpeedTest run will only use one connection during the course of that test run, which is why it only shows a single public IP address. Sustained bandwidth testing with something like iPerf will show a more accurate picture.   Speedify would pretty much have to be tunneling all traffic as the "first hop" and reassembling traffic before going back out to the public Internet so that their VPN endpoint becomes your new public IP address out on the Internet; in essence becoming an ISP over an ISP -- if that's what it's actually doing.  While that may solve one issue, it would probably cause a drastic increase in latency to do so, and I doubt it would support streaming media very well.
    • Hi, Thanks for the reply. I understand what you mean but then that's like having 2 DC's having DHCP to issue IP in case one goes down, so both DHCP scopes would have to issue same IP address to same client or they would run out of addresses. But anyway thanks for clarifying, I was getting really frustrated about not being able to solve this because I was understanding that the clients would not leave the network when the DC is down and authentication takes place at RODC. Thanks a lot.
    • Well your right and wrong at the same time, i tested the idea using a tp-link loadbalancer and while kt didnt work on websites, for torrents/netflex it worked perefctly simple messirment's of speeds on speedtest.net got me the combined speeds as well and thats without using the 802.3ad protocol which from what i been reading makes it works perfectly long story short, even if i am not able to use the "full pipe" in all applications, it make hell of a diffrance from the plain single connection   note: i think that adding a vpn layer will even solve the multipath problem, thats what speedify and others are doing to get the combined speed
    • Yeah, mine stopped working also, but this time the communicator would allow connection to the server.
      But the automated backups were not occurring. I had to re-setup the folders associated with the computer "Customize Backup For This Computer" and then the automated backups worked again. Apparently there is an option for an anniversary clean install. Then install the connector.
      I think that would be the best option. But definitely a pain in the butt. Let us know how it goes.
      Shane
      Sydney, Australia      
  • Popular Contributors