• Announcements

    • Terry (WGS)

      WGS Forums Will Close on January 31st 2017   01/18/17

      Hi everyone, We're coming up to We Got Served's ten year anniversary and I've been taking a good look at the site to work through some plans for the future. I wanted to give you all a couple of weeks notice that I'll be closing WGS Forums at the end of this month.  As you'll be aware, the forums were opened to support Windows Home Server users and have done so brilliantly, thanks to everyone's participation. However, with each day that passes, there are fewer and fewer WHS deployments out there, meaning that forum registrations and traffic has now dwindled. I've tried a few times over the years to test some forums on related or adjacent topics, however, they simply haven't caught on. It's clear that these were always going to be predominately Windows Home Server forums and, with the passing of that platform, they've served their purpose well. So, please take some time to archive anything you need over the next two weeks. Access to the forums will end on Jan 31st 2017. Many, many thanks once again for your participation and support here. It's been a great community! Very best wishes Terry
PR.

Installing Whs2011 On > 2Tb Disk

9 posts in this topic

I'm getting a lot of conflicting info here, I keep reading that it's possible to install WHS2011 on a disk greater than 2TB (or in my case a 6TB RAID5 array).

However I cannot get it to work. If I create a single 6TB array install gets to "Copying Windows Files" then fails with error Win7 setup exited with 31. I removed one of the 1.8TB drives and ran through the install again, this time it finished however the RAID array was listed as Primary and on reboot it wouldn't boot as if the boot partition was missing...

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?!

EDIT/ Perhaps I should add that I have an Asus P8H67M EVO with a UEFI bios.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.

I'm getting a lot of conflicting info here, I keep reading that it's possible to install WHS2011 on a disk greater than 2TB (or in my case a 6TB RAID5 array).

However I cannot get it to work. If I create a single 6TB array install gets to "Copying Windows Files" then fails with error Win7 setup exited with 31. I removed one of the 1.8TB drives and ran through the install again, this time it finished however the RAID array was listed as Primary and on reboot it wouldn't boot as if the boot partition was missing...

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?!

EDIT/ Perhaps I should add that I have an Asus P8H67M EVO with a UEFI bios.

**************

Yes Whs 2011 is capable of up to 16tb arrays (supported). Most

folks don't put the OS drive on the same array as the data array.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very odd, if I take a drive out of the RAID5 array and install, the install does go through and won't boot but when I check it's actually installed to the RAID5 array (that it supposedly failed on earlier.)

Now I've yanked all the RAID5 drives, and let it install to the removed drive, that seems to have worked and hopefully I can add the RAID5 disks back on later...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting a lot of conflicting info here, I keep reading that it's possible to install WHS2011 on a disk greater than 2TB (or in my case a 6TB RAID5 array).

However I cannot get it to work. If I create a single 6TB array install gets to "Copying Windows Files" then fails with error Win7 setup exited with 31. I removed one of the 1.8TB drives and ran through the install again, this time it finished however the RAID array was listed as Primary and on reboot it wouldn't boot as if the boot partition was missing...

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?!

EDIT/ Perhaps I should add that I have an Asus P8H67M EVO with a UEFI bios.

I have mine installed on a 1.8TB array. To my understanding if you want the array to be bootable must be a Legacy array which is limited by BIOS to 2gb. So to your question can I install on a 6TB array as the boot device my understanding is no

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have mine installed on a 1.8TB array. To my understanding if you want the array to be bootable must be a Legacy array which is limited by BIOS to 2gb. So to your question can I install on a 6TB array as the boot device my understanding is no

How I see it, you have 3 options:

1. Do what I did and if your raid controller allows it. Split the array into two separate volumes/luns. My areca card allows for this so I created a 120G slice (min whs 2011 will install to) and installed. I removed the D: drive and then added the rest of the space as D: (warning will mess with backups built into WHS)

2. Install the OS on a separate drive under 2G and then add the raid 5 in after the install.

3. Buy a really expensive motherboard that the bios supports EFI. This will be the future and I feel the proper way but not a lot of support for this yet.

This problem is going to be huge once those whs disks start shipping. Without experiencing this before most people won't know what to search for. I can smell a blog post coming soon on this one. <Hint Hint>

EDIT: So I missed that you have a UEFI motherboard. I am jealous. Make sure the option is turned on in the bios before installing. That is my only suggestion at that point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, I had a UEFI motherboard but WHS2011 didn't seem interested.

Well after a lot of messing about (much more than WHSv1) it's installed and seems to be running ok, there was a period after doing Windows Updates that nothing in the dashboard would load but that now seems fine.

I've started initializing the array using the Intel Rapid Storage program, after around 12hours it's 13% complete. Writing to the array atm though is absolutely awful, I've seen rights occasionally hit 15mb/s but mostly it's around 600k!! Hoping it sorts itself out once the array is fully initialized.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, I had a UEFI motherboard but WHS2011 didn't seem interested.

Well after a lot of messing about (much more than WHSv1) it's installed and seems to be running ok, there was a period after doing Windows Updates that nothing in the dashboard would load but that now seems fine.

I've started initializing the array using the Intel Rapid Storage program, after around 12hours it's 13% complete. Writing to the array atm though is absolutely awful, I've seen rights occasionally hit 15mb/s but mostly it's around 600k!! Hoping it sorts itself out once the array is fully initialized.

Ohh you are building this array on the onboard controller? I don't have any experience with ICH10R and EFI but you may still be held to the 2tb. Go get yourself a hardware controller and you will be much happier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is not WHS 2011 or motherboard. WHS 2011 works with UEFI and GPT partitions

The EFI bootloader is present on the WHS 2011 DVD [bootmgr.efi file], we only have to take care that the motherboard really does load it and not the standard mbr bootloader (bootmgr file). Some motherboard, for example my Intel DG45FC, only boots the efi bootmanager if booted from a DVD, from an USB Stick he can't.

But anyway it's not the problem.

The problem comes from the Intel chipset drivers. Currently they don't accept to install a bootable partition that is bigger than 2TB in RAID mode even with UEFI.

Currently UEFI + bootable partition bigger than 2TB only works in IDE or AHCI mode with Intel driver, it may work in raid mode in the future with new drivers but currently it is not possible.

I think in Raid mode but OS HDD in single member may works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Intel DG43GT supports "UEFI boot" from the BIOS options, but I was never able to run the EFI bootloader from the DVD, I presume because I didn't actually have an EFI shell to run from the mainboard to actually choose the EFI bootloader rather than the standard one. Even when I brought up a command prmopt in Win7 and preformatted the HDD as GPT rather than MBR, the WHS 2011 install process just reinitialized the disk as MBR anyway.

ICH10-based southbridge I think supports > 2.2TB volumes if you're using the RST driver version 10.1 and above...maybe only 10.5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Posts

    • I am running WSE2012 R2 and I only ever see red, yellow or green. I have never seen blue even when backing up. I can't explain what could be happening here, but maybe some feedback from other users may help us pin it down. What OS are your client PC's? Mine are all Win 10. Not sure if that may have a bearing.   
    • I made the leap from WHSv1 to WSE2012R2.  I like the new system but one thing seems to be missing.  In WHS v1, the tray icon would change colors to indicate various things blue - backing up now green - everything is healthy yellow - warnings detected (e.g. haven't backed up in a while) red - critical issues (e.g. recent backup failed) In WSE 2012 R2, however, I only get the blue and green indicators, even when there are critical errors on my home network.  For example, a server hard drive had failed for several weeks, but the connector icon in my system tray remained green.  I only discovered the issue when I happened to login to the dashboard for something else. Does anyone know if this feature has been removed in the latest WSE versions?  Or have I just mis-configured something?
    • I am building a new home server: I really want to use StableBit DrivePool and Scanner - am used to them and like the relative ease of use. Hardware = PC running Windows 7 Pro has SSD for OS and 5 additional 2TB HDDs + SansDigital Towerraid (model TR5M6G) connected by eSATA controller (pCie) with 5 2TB HDDs of varying age (2 brand new WD Red and the remaining 3 a combo of Hiatachi and Seagate of varying age - all test out fine for now). Towerraid is currently configured as JBOD, so I can't really see individual drives, and neither does StableBit drive pool - so I get a pool consisting 5 1.82 TB drives (the ones on the PC) and 1 giant 9.1TB drive. I have about 10 TB of data ready to go into this new build.  Will be adding more over time.  Not sure when but certain I'll have HDDs go bad on me, of course. My question(s): 1)  Is there a RAID configuration that will let StableBit do its thing watching individual drives and letting me identify sick drives that need to be removed/replaced?                           2)  If I decide to give up the RAID and just let DrivePool handle duplication, how do I configure the SansDig?                           3)  Am I just getting it all wrong from the get-go? Would appreciate any advice - thanks   
    • I have almost 10 TB in the storage pool so I was not surprised when my first server backup took a very long time (22 hrs.).  Lately the incremental server backups have been fast (15 - 18 min.)  Two days ago the server apparently initiated a full backup that failed twice but completed successfully this morning after about 23 hours.  An hour later the regular daily backup is back to a normal incremental backup times (18 min.) So why did the previous backup take so long, as long as a full backup would take? Does the server occasionally make a fresh start with a full backup to reduce the time a full incremental recovery takes?  (fewer increments, less processing time) I don't see a setting in the server backup options for specifying a number of increments between full backups, for example.    
    • I just posted a similar question elsewhere.  By Shadow Copies are you referring to the Windows 10 File History backups that periodically use shadow copy to backup open files? I too discovered that a huge amount of backup space was consumed by File History backups, no doubt because I was moving some large Blu-Ray files around.  That I fixed by moving the temporary and final file folders to the server, where they are backed up as part of the daily server backup.  That too, of course, uses Shadow Copies but that is another story. Has anyone done the math?  What is the equivalence .. or lack thereof ... between the traditional WS2012r2 (WHS v1 et al.) daily incremental backup :: and a Win7 System Image backup + File History backups? Restore time comparison? Which do you feel is best?
  • Popular Contributors