Andy D

Anyone Using An Ssd For Their Os Drive?

5 posts in this topic

I'm rebuilding my current server and I'm going to have to purchase a boot drive to replace the one I currently use since I'll be selling my Mediasmart.

I was thinking of using a 30gb ssd for the OS for WHS 2011. Can anyone think of a reason why this would be a bad idea?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.

I'm rebuilding my current server and I'm going to have to purchase a boot drive to replace the one I currently use since I'll be selling my Mediasmart.

I was thinking of using a 30gb ssd for the OS for WHS 2011. Can anyone think of a reason why this would be a bad idea?

Drive is too small.

As far as using an SSD over conventional mechanical storage, there is NO downside. I have been building SSD drives into machines for the OS for a couple years now. They are all plus and no negative. But as far as what you are doing, that drive is just too small to be considered for an OS partition.

I would suggest at least a 90GB drive (OCZ Vertex 2 would be an outstanding economical choice).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Virginia, there is a downside.

Price... a fairly large downside.

You could easily use two 320gb WD RE4 Enterprise Class drives in RAID1 for less than a single SSD. SSDs offer one advantage... speed. This isn't an important feature for a server OS drive. There is no evidence that SSDs are any more reliable in a server situation, although they do handle rough useage in a notebook PC, better than a conventional drive.

When I see the business community move to SSDs in a big way, I'll change my view. Until then, its just an enthusiast toy as they have lots of speed, but little capacity.

In full disclosure, I have 6 of them and like them for the way I use them. I don't use them on my server(s) for the reasons provided above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

correct me if I'm wrong, but minimum hard drive requirements for WHS 2011 is 120 GB to 160 GB HDD space depending of if the OS is standard or essential. Is this correct? thats what I read while reading Microsoft website , if that's true 120 GB ssd range from $180-$275, I just ordered 3 TB internal hard drive for $117.00...

Again I might be incorrect or misunderstanding the notes i read so please correct me if I'm wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it's only a 60GB requirement. I have mine installed on an old 64GB laptop SSD. Then, I have all of my storage on a RAID 5 array. It boots in just a few seconds, and is the most responsive system I've ever worked on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Posts

    • Hi, Thanks for the reply. I understand what you mean but then that's like having 2 DC's having DHCP to issue IP in case one goes down, so both DHCP scopes would have to issue same IP address to same client or they would run out of addresses. But anyway thanks for clarifying, I was getting really frustrated about not being able to solve this because I was understanding that the clients would not leave the network when the DC is down and authentication takes place at RODC. Thanks a lot.
    • Well your right and wrong at the same time, i tested the idea using a tp-link loadbalancer and while kt didnt work on websites, for torrents/netflex it worked perefctly simple messirment's of speeds on speedtest.net got me the combined speeds as well and thats without using the 802.3ad protocol which from what i been reading makes it works perfectly long story short, even if i am not able to use the "full pipe" in all applications, it make hell of a diffrance from the plain single connection   note: i think that adding a vpn layer will even solve the multipath problem, thats what speedify and others are doing to get the combined speed
    • Yeah, mine stopped working also, but this time the communicator would allow connection to the server.
      But the automated backups were not occurring. I had to re-setup the folders associated with the computer "Customize Backup For This Computer" and then the automated backups worked again. Apparently there is an option for an anniversary clean install. Then install the connector.
      I think that would be the best option. But definitely a pain in the butt. Let us know how it goes.
      Shane
      Sydney, Australia      
    • Depends on what your storage requirements are going to be.   I personally favor RAID-10 (mirrored stripe) arrays because of the lack of a need for parity, but it's not particularly storage efficient, and with your current setup, you'd have only 4TBs (3.63TiBs) of storage space available (half of an 8TB stripe due to mirroring), in which a minimum 160GBs of that 4TBs is used for the C: drive if you partition the volume during installation. WIth 4 disks, you could do RAID-5, which would give you 6TBs (5.4TiBs) of storage space (because 2TBs is used for RAID stripe parity), but then there's the parity performance penalty and the higher risk of an unrecoverable read error (URE) killing your array and losing your data if you're not using enterprise drives.   ...or you could try Storage Spaces, I guess.
    • RODCs only work with "active" services like DHCP when the RWDC (your DC) is still active.  If the RODC can't get the information from the RWDC, then the DHCP service stops on the RODC.   The problem is, since the RODC is read-only, it can't write back the DHCP lease information to AD, especially if your only read-write domain controller is down.   DNS and Global Catalog (AD authentication) works as long as clients are only reading from it, but DNS changes won't update if a client's only DNS server is a RODC.   AD best-practices is to have a minimum of two RWDCs for any domain (which Microsoft itself doesn't follow with the Essentials product in the first place), so that you have another writable domain controller that can update information in the event the primary goes offline.
  • Popular Contributors