• Announcements

    • Terry (WGS)

      WGS Forums Will Close on January 31st 2017   01/18/17

      Hi everyone, We're coming up to We Got Served's ten year anniversary and I've been taking a good look at the site to work through some plans for the future. I wanted to give you all a couple of weeks notice that I'll be closing WGS Forums at the end of this month.  As you'll be aware, the forums were opened to support Windows Home Server users and have done so brilliantly, thanks to everyone's participation. However, with each day that passes, there are fewer and fewer WHS deployments out there, meaning that forum registrations and traffic has now dwindled. I've tried a few times over the years to test some forums on related or adjacent topics, however, they simply haven't caught on. It's clear that these were always going to be predominately Windows Home Server forums and, with the passing of that platform, they've served their purpose well. So, please take some time to archive anything you need over the next two weeks. Access to the forums will end on Jan 31st 2017. Many, many thanks once again for your participation and support here. It's been a great community! Very best wishes Terry
Richard Ainz

20Gb Of Ram, Only 8Gb Usable?

13 posts in this topic

I was over my system settings and noticed this, which must have eluded me previously. See screenshot.

Any explanation?

post-22058-0-72894100-1333523429_thumb.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.

WHS 2011 is based on the Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation edition. This OS has a 8GB limit. Here is a link to MS site explaining the limits based on the different versions of the OS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn. I need that for virtual machines. Bloo****y MS

You can put Win 7 64 bit as your primary OS and then install WHS in a VM. That way you get to use all your RAM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your idea has merit, but I rathert not use a Virtual Machine "in production", at least not until I have tested a bit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have WHS 2011 running in a VirtualBox VM - I keep it for testing before I move anything to the hardware 2011. It works just fine and appears stable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your idea has merit, but I rathert not use a Virtual Machine "in production", at least not until I have tested a bit

Test it. I know of very few companies that deploy new servers to bare hardware - almost everything is virtualized these days. Even the last SBS server I deployed, even though it's the only server on the box, is in a VM. Recovery and management of the server is so much easier if it's in a VM... In fact the only servers I currently deploy to bare metal with no VM are WHS to the HP MediaSmart/DataVault appliances since they really can only support one OS due to them only supporting 4GB of RAM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know of very few companies that deploy new servers to bare hardware - almost everything is virtualized these days.

Yes, I know. I am also aware of configuration related issues with extensive virtualization that you do not have with "bare metal". We have about 80 virtual servers in ESXi environment. From what I gather of the Infrastructure Team, I consider myself fortunate not having those on my watch.

But I will check it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am also aware of configuration related issues with extensive virtualization that you do not have with "bare metal". We have about 80 virtual servers in ESXi environment. From what I gather of the Infrastructure Team, I consider myself fortunate not having those on my watch.

Am I to understand that they think Virtualization is a negative?

To paraphrase the great joke "I think your doing it wrong". While not perfect, the benefits far out weigh the issues - at least from my personal experience and for any other admins I interact with. The only issue I have with virtualization is Microsoft's Hyper-V doesn't support access to USB or serial ports from within a VM - but VMware does. Other hardware related restrictions tend to revolve around desktop OS (such as 3D graphics support - mainly for games) rather than server related issues.

Windows Home Server should run in a VM rather nicely...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Risking off topic here, a bit, but all I can say is I hear them swear and when we discuss things we do it from very different point of views. Since I deal with support I reflect the needs of the users and since they deal with server administration they reflect the need for, well, administration.

HyperV has been thrown out the window due to issues with windows firewall, if it is disabled, some patching will just generate errors, and if it is enabled other issues happen.

Issues with ESXi have been volume capacity and other stuff I don't recall right now. I could listen in a bit more, but this is not the place to discuss it anyway. From an administrative point of view, the ability to quickly create new servers with similar setup and the advantages of being able to allocate CPU/RAM resources and Disk storage in a simpler way, is of course positive. We never had so many servers... :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used Superspeed Ramdisk plus to get around the RAM limitations of xp 32 bit and in a few other windows installs. I wonder if it would work with WHS 2011? With Superspeed ramdisk you can create a ramdisk on memory the OS can't/won't allocate and put your pagefile on it; moving the virtual memory into physical memory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure that would work. WHS2011's limit is hard coded. It's restricted to 8GBs. If you want more than that, you'd need to use something like Small Business Server 2011 Essentials (which is limited to 16GBs I think... maybe 32... documenation is shady on that subject at best). Or use 2012 Essentials, who's limit is 64GBs, I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a quick search on google looking for people that have tried WHS 2011 with various ramdisk products, and was able to find able to find a german forum where they tried a couple. They had success with Primo Ramdisk Server edition and vSuite Ramdisk from what I could make out. Another forum tried the ramdisk software included with asrock motherboards but that didn't let him address any additional RAM. So it is hit and miss and dependant on what ramdisk software you choose.

http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://forum.team-mediaportal.com/threads/whs2011-ram-disk-und-16gb-ram.105010/&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dwindows%2Bhome%2Bserver%2B2011%2Bramdisk%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1577%26bih%3D891%26prmd%3Dimvnsfd&sa=X&ei=JlRqUKaPOMy6yAGspYG4BQ&ved=0CDQQ7gEwATgK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Posts

    • Please contact support@green-it-software.com and I can send you a copy.
    • Hi, I am looking for these drivers HpMssServiceSetup_v1.0.6 but the dowmload link is dead. Does anyone have a working link please. Thank you.
    • That guide is for installing Exchange on a Server Essentials network, not necessarily installing both services on the same server, which isn't a good idea at all to do (as SBS with Exchange 2007/2010 was a good example of how poorly both AD and Exchange run when both are on the same server), nor is it supported by Microsoft.  Exchange 2016 initially had compatibility issues when installed on Server 2016 until Microsoft's server team came up with KB3206632 and the Exchange team released December 2016's quarterly update (CU3 or 4). Your IIS Reverse proxy will only (currently) be supported on Windows Server 2012/R2, as you've no doubt discovered, the Application Request Routing version and update only support 2012/R2. I know it works for 2012 R2 because I'm running Exchange 2016 CU4 on Server 2012 R2 on my domain that also includes a Server Standard with Essentials Role installed (5 VMs:  2 Domain Controllers, Exchange 2016 CU4, Server Essentials and a Reverse Proxy server all running 2012 R2 using ARR 2.5 -- the ARR Reverse Proxy allows me to share Exchange, Essentials RWA and my QNAP on 443), but thus far, I haven't seen anything for Windows Server 2016.  ARR 3.0 might work with Server 2016, or your other alternative is to deploy another server running 2012/R2 and use ARR 2.5.
    • IPv6 is unchecked on the adapters for client and server and disabled on router. Still no connection. Any other ideas?
    • I realize this is probably not the right place. Is Server 2016 Std available for only one CPU/eight cores?
      All is find is 16 cores or more. Will probably end up with 2016 Essentials anyway.
      Thank you.
  • Popular Contributors