GaMeR

Media Center 2005 on Windows Home Server

196 posts in this topic

Drashna and me have great ideas about WHS. We've allready showed you some stuff you could do with your WHS (See the WIKI), but this one is the best idea till now I think:

th_92096_WHS0MCE_5Looking_cool9_122_719lo.JPG

That's right! Media Center running on your Windows Home Server :) No more need for 2 systems, have your home server also act like a real media center!

Download here: Windows Home Server Media Center Install Script (Password: WeGotServed).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.

Very cool!

I'll have to check this out and see how it works. This would be an answer to one of my pet peeves about MC.

Be back later to let you how it works out.

Whoops, as usual, I did not read the whole title. Will this work with VMC? Over to Wiki for more details...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, this will only work with XP's version of Media Center. Maybe it will with v2 of WHS, but we have no idea... yet.

And we are working on two versions, a stand alone installer for those with WHS already installed, and a "Windows Home Server: We Got Served Edition" which will install Media Center during the installation. And a few other goodies too. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I can say right now is "be careful"

I am not going to blow a whistle and cry foul, but make sure you own a license to Windows XP MCE 2005 if you install this on WHS. Not only that, but make sure you are not using the copy of MCE 2005 already. If you install MCE on WHS independent of XP, you might be running afoul of the MCE license as well.

All it takes is someone to do what they are not supposed to and Microsoft will build in support to prevent Media Center from running in WHS, unless they choose to include Media Center in the WHS License to button up some of the media shortcomings of WHS...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? I'm basicly my own OEM, and I have a licence for MCE. Well, it's on it's way actually, just bought it today. :P But that's not the point, we're justing having lots of fun with it and I think it could really be intersting for people who would like to have WHS and MCE in one box.

The majority of people won't use it, but some of us see lots of potential in it. I'm actually thinking of buying an xbox 360 if we get this working!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only thing I can say right now is "be careful"

I am not going to blow a whistle and cry foul, but make sure you own a license to Windows XP MCE 2005 if you install this on WHS. Not only that, but make sure you are not using the copy of MCE 2005 already. If you install MCE on WHS independent of XP, you might be running afoul of the MCE license as well.

All it takes is someone to do what they are not supposed to and Microsoft will build in support to prevent Media Center from running in WHS, unless they choose to include Media Center in the WHS License to button up some of the media shortcomings of WHS...

Thanks for the warning, but this topic has been talked about to death. We understand the legal issues that may or may not arise. As for not being able to install MCE on WHS, well that has already happened and requires a reg hack to get around. We understand that not only is this completely unsupported by microsoft in any way, shape or form, but is probably highly discouraged.

I definitely do appreciate your concern. Thanks for that. But you can't keep a tinkerer from tinkering. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not trying to discourage, I just said what needs to be said... Ultimately it is up to the end-user as to what they want to do.

You can provide a means for those people, by way of wikis, walk-throughs, and enablers... but if you were to start distributing an installer or a slipstreamed WHS install disc, you could get this community in some deep **** right quick. Not to mention also making a bandwidth shitstorm because not only would it be a WHS install disc, but another of those oh-so-tempting no-no distributions. That is because as soon as a "Windows Home Server: We Got Served Edition" hit the net, you know someone will work to fully crack it, and then start distributing it themselves... and who gets the blame after that? you got it... WGS.

Plain and simply again I am stating: "Be Careful..." We are listed as an official download and discussion area on the product page. No need to jeopardize that plus get Terry pulled into possible litigation and/or losing his MVP status.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. I agree with every point. I wouldn't dream of doing anything that would jeopardize WGS. Nor were we considering posting it on WGS. And actually, I was considering approaching Microsoft about this issue, just to avoid causing any problem for MS, WGS, or Terry.

And as for the name, we've come up with a different name that has nothing to do with WGS, but until it is done, and has absolutely no problems, we haven't even considered actually releasing it. Talked, yes. But like I said, we have no intention of causing any problem by doing this. It started off as one of those projects of "Can we actually do this", and evolved from there. For those familiar with Gamer and myself, you can tell we like integrating and slip streaming things, and this was no exception. And has been a fun and interesting project.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this really does work, AND supports extenders, then its a huge step. And hopefully it`ll shame MS into releasing an official version!

I have an XP MCE license, and I`ve love to use it with WHS :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if this really works and MS picks up on it, I would even consider paying for it if MS released an official add-in. Or whatever they chose to call it. For some reason, I just don't see MS releasing something like this as a freebie as part of WHS v1.

But on the other hand, given all the problems, i.e. the Corruption Bug, that WHS users have had to endure this might just be a nice "carrot" to improve the product's image.

That could make it a win-win situation for both MS and the consumer.

The one problem that I do see about the while thing is; how would this be integrated into the WHS console? Probably should not be at all. What I would imagine as the ideal solution would be to install a link on each client machine which could then open MC on that client. You got 5 computer or "devices"? You could have 5 instances of MC running! If all the clients want to watch TV at the same time, some sort of tuner farm or related HW setup would be needed.

The beginnings of true "connected" home! This would then make WHS a true home server.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can asure you all we won't release a complete product like this. What we could do is provide the files/scripts/patches or tutorial for people who want to make this version of WHS. This mean they would need a legit copy of WHS and MCE. And as Drashna allready said, this project just started with the question: Can we do this? Will it work?

Our intentions are not to distribute pirated software, and we won't. People still need thier valid licences for thier products (that is WHS & MCE) to be able to activate. There are other ways, we know that too, but we won't cover those ways.

And since there are other sites/forums trying to hack MCE onto Windows 2003 this isn't new. It was about to happen sooner or later anyway. Personally I don't see anything wrong in this project.

Well, if this really works and MS picks up on it, I would even consider paying for it if MS released an official add-in. Or whatever they chose to call it. For some reason, I just don't see MS releasing something like this as a freebie as part of WHS v1.

Actually, I like to think the other way around. I hope MS picks up on it and use this idea in v2, or even in the next Major update of v1. the MCE market is huge, and having WHS jump into that market it could be a huge boost.

Personally, if MS would have made 2 versions of WHS, 1 without Media Center and 1 with. I would have bought the one with Media Center. MS seems to be good in releasing different kind of windows versions with no actual differences. I use vista Ultimate, but I don't see any "real" differences with Vista Premium. no extra vallue is added to Ultimate compared to Home Premium. At least a WHS with and without Media Center would be "real" value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What we could do is provide the files/scripts/patches or tutorial for people who want to make this version of WHS.

Could you tell us exactly that "this version of WHS" is? I think the main question is, can it support Media Centre Extenders like the xbox 360?

Our intentions are not to distribute pirated software, and we won't. People still need thier valid licences for thier products (that is WHS & MCE) to be able to activate.

Quite right. I`ve still got mine, and I`m itching to put it to good use B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could you tell us exactly that "this version of WHS" is? I think the main question is, can it support Media Centre Extenders like the xbox 360?

One of the reasons why I wanted Media Center on WHS. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm currently trying to get a 360 from a friend and test out the media center functionality. I don't see why it wouldn't assuming it works 100%. However, there are still a number of things we need to do to make this "ready", including a number of performance hacks. We have noticed a number of unresolvable errors during installation, but it works fine despite this. And worse case scenario, it may end up more as a media extender server, but that isn't a bad outcome IMO.

As for "shaming" Microsoft into including this functionality in WHS in the future: We absolutely hope this happens. And this may just appear in v2, but only Microsoft really knows that!

For now, lets just say, it works with a few bugs, and we can even get it to install during the WHS installation! We are working on getting *everything* needed to run the best we can. But when testing the slightest change, it takes about 10minutes to re-compile the DVD image, and about 60-90 minutes to install on my Virtual Machine.

EDIT: Also, Media Center does not, even normally work under Remote Desktop, unforuntely. XP MCE or VMC.

The current working name we have for this "version" of WHS is "Windows Home Server: X Files Edition". It is a really bad, inside joke. Once you've messed around with the installer DVD, and have become familar with it, you will completely understand.

And I want to thank GaMeR for finding a) the information (originallly on TGB forums, and officially thank those guys too), and B) for testing it out and making sure it works! My contribution has been integrating it into the installer due to my familarity with Windows Installation disks, and WHS's install disk itself. Lets just say that I know more about the installer that is probably healthy or safe. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like there is no way for us to manually enable hardware acceleration for video or audio, so after WHS is installed, you would have to do that manually, for better performance. However, enabling windows audio service by default is really simple, so that is a plus.

On the downside, because Media Center is designed to only run on XP Media Center Edition, there are a number of unpreventable errors that we have run into. This doesn't prevent you from using Media Center from what we've seen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On the downside, because Media Center is designed to only run on XP Media Center Edition, there are a number of unpreventable errors that we have run into. This doesn't prevent you from using Media Center from what we've seen.

Media Center itself should work fine without errors, the only errors are installation based, and from what I've seen it's nothing major. Also my script corrects the error anyway. I've been digging into this and it looks like the CAB installer has trouble registereing one of the .dll files. But since my script does this automaticly after the CAB is installed is gets registered correctly anyway (I'm still investigating this).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is amazing! I've been really hoping someone one do this, I've been using gbpvr which isnt nearly as beautiful. Tell me, does Webguide work with it and recognize it being an mce? If so it would be great to be able to stream and remote record programs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Guys,

Nice work! I integrated Media Center in RC1 a year ago, posted it at the Microsoft forums

When using it I didn't find it very usefull to run Media Center of my WHS, it is to big and noisy compaired to the Mac Mini's I use as Media Centers, plus the fact that I wanted to switch to Vista for my Media Centers, so I only used the recording functionality.

I used Babqvant's Recording Broker to move my scheduled recordings to the WHS and it worked great. Only downside is you can't see your planned recordings on your Media Centers after they're moved to the WHS box.

I had no errors running it on WHS, the only annoying thing I had was an extra dialog when shutting down or restaring the WHS, because of the extra services for extenders (v1!)

Did you guys manage to get Rollup 2 integrated? This would allow Extenders V2 (Xbox 360 for example) to connect.

(After getting my RTM copy I never tried integrating it again because I had no more spare hardware to test it, and also to little time :( )

Cheers,

Danee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Guys,

Nice work! I integrated Media Center in RC1 a year ago, posted it at the Microsoft forums

When using it I didn't find it very usefull to run Media Center of my WHS, it is to big and noisy compaired to the Mac Mini's I use as Media Centers, plus the fact that I wanted to switch to Vista for my Media Centers, so I only used the recording functionality.

I used Babqvant's Recording Broker to move my scheduled recordings to the WHS and it worked great. Only downside is you can't see your planned recordings on your Media Centers after they're moved to the WHS box.

I had no errors running it on WHS, the only annoying thing I had was an extra dialog when shutting down or restaring the WHS, because of the extra services for extenders (v1!)

Did you guys manage to get Rollup 2 integrated? This would allow Extenders V2 (Xbox 360 for example) to connect.

(After getting my RTM copy I never tried integrating it again because I had no more spare hardware to test it, and also to little time :( )

Cheers,

Danee

What happens when you try to install Rollup2 ? does it say "Windows Media Center not found" ?

In the WHS registry look for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Media Center\Ident key.

Set Ident key number to “ 3.0 “ reboot WHS then try installing Rollup 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe we are using Rollup 2, but I don't know for sure. GaMeR does know, and if anyone knows the way to check (correct file version and the like), let me know. And Richard, we don't have that problem, and checked that entry anways. Set to "3.0".

Right now the major problems are: when installing, it fails to find RegASM.exe and prompts an error. Non-fatal, but annoying, and would prevent automated installation. Which means you would have to have a keyboard and monitor attached. However, including regasm.exe produces a relatively fatal error. And media center will not work. Something about languate, not 100% sure. The other problem is that there is no set way to enable hardware acceleration for audio or video, which are pretty much required for smooth playback. Both will have to be done manually, by the PBtC (Person Behind the Curtain).

Other than these two problems, it installs pretty much seemlessly from the WHS disk. Oh, and it does have the prompt about the extenders when shutting down/rebooting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe we are using Rollup 2, but I don't know for sure. GaMeR does know, and if anyone knows the way to check (correct file version and the like), let me know. And Richard, we don't have that problem, and checked that entry anways. Set to "3.0".

Right now the major problems are: when installing, it fails to find RegASM.exe and prompts an error. Non-fatal, but annoying, and would prevent automated installation. Which means you would have to have a keyboard and monitor attached. However, including regasm.exe produces a relatively fatal error. And media center will not work. Something about languate, not 100% sure. The other problem is that there is no set way to enable hardware acceleration for audio or video, which are pretty much required for smooth playback. Both will have to be done manually, by the PBtC (Person Behind the Curtain).

Other than these two problems, it installs pretty much seemlessly from the WHS disk. Oh, and it does have the prompt about the extenders when shutting down/rebooting.

Have look at this thread http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/1/272007/ShowThread.aspx it's for Media Center 2005 on Server 2003.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

iirc, that is where GaMeR and Drashna got their start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup. This is exactly where we've gotten a lot of information from. However, there is still a distinct lack info about R2. And, no it looks like we don't have Rollup 2 working.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't had any experience with Media Centre. I've had a little 34CM TV for so long now, all my Media happens on my PC (I have two 17" CRTs).

I'll probably upgrade to 2x 22" LCDs for my PC before I get a bigger TV.

So, Winamp has been my long-time media player of choice.

I can see advantages in Media Centre, but have no use for it at the moment. Hopefully this will change in the future, I would like an XBox that support Blu-Ray, but I guess that's a while off too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smadge, I used to be the same way. I swore by WinAmp, but when I started using vista, I wanted to try and not install anything new. Period. One of the first things I started playing with was Windows Media Center, it was pretty nice and very pretty. It wasn't until I got my hands on a HP Media Center PC (m8100n) that I really fell in love with Media Center. Though vista's Media Center looks a lot better, and is generally more powerful, XP' Media Center works very well too.

And rest assured, despite any problems we may have trying to completely integrate XP MCE Rollup 2 with Windows Home Server, I am not going to stop trying until we have succeeded. We know that it works, and that it can be installed, now we need to figure out how to get Rollup 2 installed and working.

I've got a number of ideas, but those are going to have to wait til after my computer situation is settled. Silly me didn't check to make sure MOBO had a raid controller. Even us experts make "noob mistakes".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Posts

    • Well, what are you upgrading from?  If it's Windows Home Server, are you using its client backup feature?  And if so, is this something you want to continue? What do you use your server for, and are there any new capabilities you want to take advantage of?
    • OK here is my problems I have an old dell 1430 server with a 256mb ssd drive and 2 3MB hdds. the ssd drive is where I would install win 10 . what do I have to do to make this (upgrade) to win 10 go as smoothly as "possible"? I can put the OS on a hdd also this is a store bought version of win 10 home.
    • I wouldn't go for Storage Spaces - there have been reports of issues when a disk goes bad (and I too have had that sort of problem). You can go down the RAID route if you have the hardware controller to support it - don't go for software RAID. Alternatively, have a look at Stablebit Drivepool which give you the flexibility of duplication at the folder level or across all storage. If you have data that doesn't need to be protected, you don't have to sacrifice the space for duplication of that folder. 
    • Like I said, you won't get the combined (aggregate) bandwidth to a single destination.   Torrenting makes multiple outgoing and can receive multiple incoming connections to and from multiple seeders and leechers (behaving more like the load-balanced scenario) in the best-case scenario, so it's one of the few applications that scale fairly well with WAN load-balancing, and if you're just downloading data, the torrent application can reassemble the whole torrent from the randomly received chunks from each seeder.  Torrent was almost designed to benefit from WAN load-balancing because of the way the P2P network was conceived. ...but that wouldn't work for streaming media or online gaming or VoIP where there's no mechanism to deal with out-of-order packets being sent and received, or the fact that it's still asymmetrically routed -- in that instance, you're still limited to the bandwidth of a single connection, you can just make more of them at a time on different paths.   802.3ad or LACP (Dynamic Link Aggregation) requires switching and routing hardware that's also LACP-compliant in order for it to work, but in that case, would be more like the aforementioned ISP IMUX connection than WAN load-balancing.   Your SpeedTest results are probably from burstable traffic over one connection, because a single SpeedTest run will only use one connection during the course of that test run, which is why it only shows a single public IP address. Sustained bandwidth testing with something like iPerf will show a more accurate picture.   Speedify would pretty much have to be tunneling all traffic as the "first hop" and reassembling traffic before going back out to the public Internet so that their VPN endpoint becomes your new public IP address out on the Internet; in essence becoming an ISP over an ISP -- if that's what it's actually doing.  While that may solve one issue, it would probably cause a drastic increase in latency to do so, and I doubt it would support streaming media very well.
    • Hi, Thanks for the reply. I understand what you mean but then that's like having 2 DC's having DHCP to issue IP in case one goes down, so both DHCP scopes would have to issue same IP address to same client or they would run out of addresses. But anyway thanks for clarifying, I was getting really frustrated about not being able to solve this because I was understanding that the clients would not leave the network when the DC is down and authentication takes place at RODC. Thanks a lot.
  • Popular Contributors