Christine

Failed remote access ISS Admin Service won't start

4 posts in this topic

Hi All,

Before I do a complete reinstall or throw my WHS off the roof I thought I would throw my situation out to other members and see if anyone has any ideas on how to repair this issue. A week or so ago one of my external hard drives failed. Before the drive failed completely I think it was somehow creating havoc with entire system. The backup service would randomly stop running, I lost remote access, and had file conflicts coming out of my ears. All the while the console was indicating that the drive was healthy. I ran chkdsk /f /r on all the drives and for some reason that is beyond my newbie mind this particular drive failed completely. Because my system is home brew and build with duct tape and gorilla glue, I decided to go with a larger drive 1.37 tb and add a sata card. This all seemed to work fine, but I still can't get remote access to work. The ISS Admin Service will not start and I don't have a clue why. The console is giving me the port forwarding has failed error. Note that is was working fine before the drive failed. I have since manually configured the router to forward ports 800, 443 and 4125. Still no joy. I have a backup of the server on a external drive and I'm wondering if I should try to reinstall from the backup or do a complete reinstall . When I restored from the backup before the drive failed it seemed to cause additional problems, but I was never sure of their origin. I think this has something to do with the ISS Admin Service failing to start, but I'm still kind of a newbie and can't figure this out. Thanks in advance for any help.

Christine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.

Well, I would recommend a fresh installation. It's your best bet. as for why the IIS Admin service isn't starting... I've no idea why, and would need log files to figure that out specifically, but my guess is that there may be a corrupted file somewhere.

Without IIS Admin service running, the webserver will not start. If it doesn't start, port forwarding will fail because it checks if the site can be connected to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, I would recommend a fresh installation. It's your best bet. as for why the IIS Admin service isn't starting... I've no idea why, and would need log files to figure that out specifically, but my guess is that there may be a corrupted file somewhere.

Without IIS Admin service running, the webserver will not start. If it doesn't start, port forwarding will fail because it checks if the site can be connected to.

Hi Drashna,

That's exactly what I did. Although the system wouldn't let me do a reinstall and I had to do a fresh install. It turns out that not one, but two of my drives where bad. Of course the other failed drive was the system drive. Not much damage was done as I had everything backed up on external drives (twice, just in case). I am looking at the bright side...now I have a nice clean machine again. If there is a lesson to be learned here it is that I was using very old drives and had too many of them. So perhaps is better to use larger drives and fewer of them. For sure not ones that are 7 or 8 years old. It is a miracle they lasted as long as they did.

Thanks again,

Christine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ouch. Yeah, that would cause the IIS Admin service to not start! :)

I have a thing against old drives. They die. End of story. Old parts are even worse. THat and one of the biggest issues with WHS that I have seen is old drives.

As for new drives, I like to wait about six months after initial release of a drive before consider buying new ones though. Seagate's "recent" issue reinforces that fact.

And on the plus side, a nice fresh installation can be very refreshing. (though after about 60, they kinda get annoying :P)

Glad to hear you got everything sorted out though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Posts

    • Hi, New to posting in these forums, so hello!   I used to run the original WHS V1, then WHS2011 on a MediaSmart server. I just built a new server platform with leftover parts from my gaming pc. I installed WHS2011 since I had purchased it years ago, but it looks like Windows Server 2012 R2 has become very inexpensive.  So, which is better for a Home Server? P.S. I believe the platform is plenty powerful for either of these as a home server. Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z AMD FX-8320E (Eight Core) 16 GB (4x4) DDR3 1866MHZ RAM 160GB SSD System Drive 6TB (3x2TB) Storage Drives ATI Radeon HD 3800 (Rarely use it)
    • Well, what are you upgrading from?  If it's Windows Home Server, are you using its client backup feature?  And if so, is this something you want to continue? What do you use your server for, and are there any new capabilities you want to take advantage of?
    • OK here is my problems I have an old dell 1430 server with a 256mb ssd drive and 2 3MB hdds. the ssd drive is where I would install win 10 . what do I have to do to make this (upgrade) to win 10 go as smoothly as "possible"? I can put the OS on a hdd also this is a store bought version of win 10 home.
    • I wouldn't go for Storage Spaces - there have been reports of issues when a disk goes bad (and I too have had that sort of problem). You can go down the RAID route if you have the hardware controller to support it - don't go for software RAID. Alternatively, have a look at Stablebit Drivepool which give you the flexibility of duplication at the folder level or across all storage. If you have data that doesn't need to be protected, you don't have to sacrifice the space for duplication of that folder. 
    • Like I said, you won't get the combined (aggregate) bandwidth to a single destination.   Torrenting makes multiple outgoing and can receive multiple incoming connections to and from multiple seeders and leechers (behaving more like the load-balanced scenario) in the best-case scenario, so it's one of the few applications that scale fairly well with WAN load-balancing, and if you're just downloading data, the torrent application can reassemble the whole torrent from the randomly received chunks from each seeder.  Torrent was almost designed to benefit from WAN load-balancing because of the way the P2P network was conceived. ...but that wouldn't work for streaming media or online gaming or VoIP where there's no mechanism to deal with out-of-order packets being sent and received, or the fact that it's still asymmetrically routed -- in that instance, you're still limited to the bandwidth of a single connection, you can just make more of them at a time on different paths.   802.3ad or LACP (Dynamic Link Aggregation) requires switching and routing hardware that's also LACP-compliant in order for it to work, but in that case, would be more like the aforementioned ISP IMUX connection than WAN load-balancing.   Your SpeedTest results are probably from burstable traffic over one connection, because a single SpeedTest run will only use one connection during the course of that test run, which is why it only shows a single public IP address. Sustained bandwidth testing with something like iPerf will show a more accurate picture.   Speedify would pretty much have to be tunneling all traffic as the "first hop" and reassembling traffic before going back out to the public Internet so that their VPN endpoint becomes your new public IP address out on the Internet; in essence becoming an ISP over an ISP -- if that's what it's actually doing.  While that may solve one issue, it would probably cause a drastic increase in latency to do so, and I doubt it would support streaming media very well.
  • Popular Contributors