jimz06

Account locked out of shared folder access

5 posts in this topic

I've run into an odd and annoying problem of having a user account (the one I set up for Remote Access, everything else is handled with the guest account) locked out from access to the shared folders. Specifically I get this message:

"\\Mediaserver is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. The referenced account is currently locked out and may not be logged on to."

I can still launch the console from the computer that has the user account and rdp in from that computer but no access to the folders. If I go through the cycle of deleting the user account and recreating it, it works for a while and then (haven't confirmed but might be the next client reboot) access is denied.

Looking at the event viewer to see what is coincident with this denial, I always find an obscure reference to a printer that isn't even attached to the WHS:

"Driver Canon MP170 Series Printer required for printer Canon MP170 Series Printer is unknown. Contact the administrator to install the driver before you log in again."

When the troublesome user account is deleted in the console everything works fine through the guest account access. Any idea what sort of OS tomfoolery is at work here?

*Yes, access permission on the folders show full access is activated for that user account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.

I know Server 2003 has an account lockout, mostly for repeated bad password requests. I think something is definitely up with your user accounts. You could try finding that lockout policy and disabling it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get the same error message when I try to stream music from the server (using Windows Media Player) without having first logged into the shared folders. It has taken multiple reboots of both the server & client before I can eventually access the shared folders again. Would someone please tell me how to disable this extremely irritating "feature" of a supposedly mature OS?

Thanks,

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get the same error message when I try to stream music from the server (using Windows Media Player) without having first logged into the shared folders. It has taken multiple reboots of both the server & client before I can eventually access the shared folders again. Would someone please tell me how to disable this extremely irritating "feature" of a supposedly mature OS?

Thanks,

David

I occasionally have this issue. For me, the best solution is to wait and try again a little later. It appears to be dependent upon the load on the server coupled with the drive activity. I use Task Manager through the Advanced Admin Console AddIn by Andreas M.

LostInHere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I occasionally have this issue. For me, the best solution is to wait and try again a little later. It appears to be dependent upon the load on the server coupled with the drive activity. I use Task Manager through the Advanced Admin Console AddIn by Andreas M.

LostInHere

Sad to say, waiting accomplishes nothing. Task Manager says the system is loafing (0-5%). When I check user accounts, all are listed as enabled. I find it depressing that 8 years after it's introduction, MHS is still so buggy that no one seems to know how to deal with mysterious occasional 'lockouts' of shared folders. What a POS.

Sigh,

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Posts

    • I wouldn't go for Storage Spaces - there have been reports of issues when a disk goes bad (and I too have had that sort of problem). You can go down the RAID route if you have the hardware controller to support it - don't go for software RAID. Alternatively, have a look at Stablebit Drivepool which give you the flexibility of duplication at the folder level or across all storage. If you have data that doesn't need to be protected, you don't have to sacrifice the space for duplication of that folder. 
    • Like I said, you won't get the combined (aggregate) bandwidth to a single destination.   Torrenting makes multiple outgoing and can receive multiple incoming connections to and from multiple seeders and leechers (behaving more like the load-balanced scenario) in the best-case scenario, so it's one of the few applications that scale fairly well with WAN load-balancing, and if you're just downloading data, the torrent application can reassemble the whole torrent from the randomly received chunks from each seeder.  Torrent was almost designed to benefit from WAN load-balancing because of the way the P2P network was conceived. ...but that wouldn't work for streaming media or online gaming or VoIP where there's no mechanism to deal with out-of-order packets being sent and received, or the fact that it's still asymmetrically routed -- in that instance, you're still limited to the bandwidth of a single connection, you can just make more of them at a time on different paths.   802.3ad or LACP (Dynamic Link Aggregation) requires switching and routing hardware that's also LACP-compliant in order for it to work, but in that case, would be more like the aforementioned ISP IMUX connection than WAN load-balancing.   Your SpeedTest results are probably from burstable traffic over one connection, because a single SpeedTest run will only use one connection during the course of that test run, which is why it only shows a single public IP address. Sustained bandwidth testing with something like iPerf will show a more accurate picture.   Speedify would pretty much have to be tunneling all traffic as the "first hop" and reassembling traffic before going back out to the public Internet so that their VPN endpoint becomes your new public IP address out on the Internet; in essence becoming an ISP over an ISP -- if that's what it's actually doing.  While that may solve one issue, it would probably cause a drastic increase in latency to do so, and I doubt it would support streaming media very well.
    • Hi, Thanks for the reply. I understand what you mean but then that's like having 2 DC's having DHCP to issue IP in case one goes down, so both DHCP scopes would have to issue same IP address to same client or they would run out of addresses. But anyway thanks for clarifying, I was getting really frustrated about not being able to solve this because I was understanding that the clients would not leave the network when the DC is down and authentication takes place at RODC. Thanks a lot.
    • Well your right and wrong at the same time, i tested the idea using a tp-link loadbalancer and while kt didnt work on websites, for torrents/netflex it worked perefctly simple messirment's of speeds on speedtest.net got me the combined speeds as well and thats without using the 802.3ad protocol which from what i been reading makes it works perfectly long story short, even if i am not able to use the "full pipe" in all applications, it make hell of a diffrance from the plain single connection   note: i think that adding a vpn layer will even solve the multipath problem, thats what speedify and others are doing to get the combined speed
    • Yeah, mine stopped working also, but this time the communicator would allow connection to the server.
      But the automated backups were not occurring. I had to re-setup the folders associated with the computer "Customize Backup For This Computer" and then the automated backups worked again. Apparently there is an option for an anniversary clean install. Then install the connector.
      I think that would be the best option. But definitely a pain in the butt. Let us know how it goes.
      Shane
      Sydney, Australia      
  • Popular Contributors