Forums

  1. We Got Served eBook Discussion

    1. Building a Windows 10 Home Server

      Discuss Building a Windows 10 Home Server and ask any questions as you follow the guide. 

      138
      posts
  2. Home Servers & NAS

    1. Apple Mac OS X Server

      Discuss your experiences with and questions about Apple OS X Server.

      177
      posts
    2. Network Attached Storage

      If you want to chat about NAS devices, you're amongst friends right here.

      325
      posts
    3. Server Hardware

      Discuss your server hardware in this forum.

      19280
      posts
    4. 114480
      posts
  3. Smart Home

    1. Components

      If you have a problem with your smart home kit, or have a questions about a specific component that doesn't fit in another forum, share it here.

      • No posts here yet
    2. Network/IP Cameras

      Use this forum to chat about Network/IP Cameras.

      180
      posts
    3. Lighting

      Use this forum to discuss smart home lighting solutions, such as Philips Hue, Lightify and others.

      • No posts here yet
    4. Security

      Smart Locks, motion detectors, home sensors, alarms and more. Talk about them here.

      2
      posts
    5. Smart Home Platforms

      Discuss Smart Home Platforms such as SmartThings, Apple HomeKit and others right here.

      2
      posts
    6. Temperature Control

      Discuss your experiences with smart home temperature control devices like the Nest Learning Thermostat, Honeywell Lyric and others.

      1
      post
  4. Computers, Networking and Storage

    1. Apple Mac OS X

      Need help a with Mac? Talk here.

      646
      posts
    2. Windows

      Help and support for Windows PCs.

      868
      posts
    3. Hard Drives and Storage

      If you're looking for discussion about hard drives, solid state drives and other storage media, then head here.

      76
      posts
    4. Networking

      From Ethernet to Powerline, Wi-Fi, Routers and Switches - discuss your networking issues and victories in this forum.

      114
      posts
  5. Home Cinema and Gaming

    1. Digital Media Receivers

      Discuss digital media receivers which connect to home servers, PCs and other networked attached storage devices.

      286
      posts
    2. Xbox & PlayStation

      Share your experiences and issues with Microsoft's Xbox 360 and Xbox One and the Sony PlayStation.

      578
      posts
  6. Mobile

    1. 88
      posts
  7. Open Mic

    1. General Chat

      If we've not covered your discussions in other forums, then post it here.

      1984
      posts
    2. Pleased to Meet You!

      New to the forums? Feel free to pop in here, introduce yourself and post your home server specs, if you wish.

      2132
      posts


Upgrade to a WGS Supporter Account to remove this ad.



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      99738
    • Most Online
      1684

    Newest Member
    hfguk
    Joined
  • Latest Posts

    • I wouldn't go for Storage Spaces - there have been reports of issues when a disk goes bad (and I too have had that sort of problem). You can go down the RAID route if you have the hardware controller to support it - don't go for software RAID. Alternatively, have a look at Stablebit Drivepool which give you the flexibility of duplication at the folder level or across all storage. If you have data that doesn't need to be protected, you don't have to sacrifice the space for duplication of that folder. 
    • Like I said, you won't get the combined (aggregate) bandwidth to a single destination.   Torrenting makes multiple outgoing and can receive multiple incoming connections to and from multiple seeders and leechers (behaving more like the load-balanced scenario) in the best-case scenario, so it's one of the few applications that scale fairly well with WAN load-balancing, and if you're just downloading data, the torrent application can reassemble the whole torrent from the randomly received chunks from each seeder.  Torrent was almost designed to benefit from WAN load-balancing because of the way the P2P network was conceived. ...but that wouldn't work for streaming media or online gaming or VoIP where there's no mechanism to deal with out-of-order packets being sent and received, or the fact that it's still asymmetrically routed -- in that instance, you're still limited to the bandwidth of a single connection, you can just make more of them at a time on different paths.   802.3ad or LACP (Dynamic Link Aggregation) requires switching and routing hardware that's also LACP-compliant in order for it to work, but in that case, would be more like the aforementioned ISP IMUX connection than WAN load-balancing.   Your SpeedTest results are probably from burstable traffic over one connection, because a single SpeedTest run will only use one connection during the course of that test run, which is why it only shows a single public IP address. Sustained bandwidth testing with something like iPerf will show a more accurate picture.   Speedify would pretty much have to be tunneling all traffic as the "first hop" and reassembling traffic before going back out to the public Internet so that their VPN endpoint becomes your new public IP address out on the Internet; in essence becoming an ISP over an ISP -- if that's what it's actually doing.  While that may solve one issue, it would probably cause a drastic increase in latency to do so, and I doubt it would support streaming media very well.
    • Hi, Thanks for the reply. I understand what you mean but then that's like having 2 DC's having DHCP to issue IP in case one goes down, so both DHCP scopes would have to issue same IP address to same client or they would run out of addresses. But anyway thanks for clarifying, I was getting really frustrated about not being able to solve this because I was understanding that the clients would not leave the network when the DC is down and authentication takes place at RODC. Thanks a lot.
  • Latest Topics